This LibGuide outlines some of the common types of reviews including literature, systematic, and scoping reviews, and lists some ways by which University Librarians can assist in conducting such reviews.
Definition: A form of knowledge synthesis that applies systematic review methodology within a time-constrained setting. That is, the components or steps of the systematic review process are simplified, accelerated/fast-tracked, or omitted/side-stepped to produce information in a shortened timeframe.
Aim: To expedite the conduct of reviews to inform health policy and systems decisions, and to provide actionable and relevant evidence in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Key characteristics: A rapid review is best designed for new or emerging research topics, updates of previous reviews, critical topics, to assess what is already known about a policy or practice.
Identify a research topic and frame a narrow research question
Select your study inclusion and exclusion criteria (e.g. time period, language, location, age range, animal or human studies, type of published material)
Create a study search protocol using keywords from the research question
Plan and execute a literature search using a key database
Store all citations and maintain a record
Screen your results to select eligible documents
Report for publication
Strengths: Useful for addressing issues that need quick decisions. Faster time to completion, typically done in 5 weeks up to 3 months.
Drawbacks/Limitations: Risk of missing the significance of a theme that emerges from the literature. Greater chance of bias. Limited appraisal and assessment. Limitation of the search not being comprehensive.
Source: Cochrane Training. (2018, August 22). Difference between systematic reviews and rapid reviews [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDX_rWKCRVs&t=185s